[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAODwPW8kXZ107kMuVGya9Y=i+8QwQzQHokXCpybzMBjd_w_83w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:03:35 +0100
From: Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Jack Rosenthal <jrosenth@...omium.org>,
Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: coreboot: Check size of table entry and split memcpy
Have you considered adding the flexible array member directly to the
union in struct coreboot_device instead? I think that would make this
a bit simpler by not having to copy header and data portion
separately.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists