[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7hJbjnbcxZnh/9M@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 16:16:46 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] spi: spidev: fix a race condition when accessing
spidev->spi
On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 03:27:57PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> IMO the complication of using an RW semaphore is insignificant and
> maybe a comment next to its declaration in struct spidev would
> suffice?
The complication is using a semaphore at all, it's a pretty unusual
locking construct and the whole up/down thing isn't clear to people
who aren't familiar with it. Given that there's no clounting being
used rwlock would be a much more obvious choice if the microseconds
of extra concurrency is meaningful somehow.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists