[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7i1h3lCMKfxB532@zn.tnic>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 00:57:59 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bp:tip-x86-alternatives 1/1] error[E0588]: packed type cannot
transitively contain a `#[repr(align)]` type
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 12:25:17AM +0100, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> Yeah, note the x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust config name. It is a config the
> kernel test robot added for testing with Rust enabled (which explains
> the version text you saw for `rustc`).
I figured as much.
As I said:
"These reproduction instructions look insufficient to me."
> The script is meant to be called as a Make target, e.g. `make LLVM=1
> rustavailable`. Perhaps we can put a message if the script was called
> directly.
No need - I ran it by hand just to show that I don't have a rust compiler
installed.
Bottom line is: if I get a build report involving a rust compiler, there better
be in the reproduction instructions a hint how to install one so that I can
reproduce. Alternatively, I can always simply ignore it.
And while we're reporting bugs: the error message from the compiler itself could
use some "humanization" - I have zero clue what it is trying to tell me.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists