linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf: Add more syscalls to benchmark

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <06c8a265-0120-c4e1-6032-7bb3190df90a@loongson.cn>
Date:   Sat, 7 Jan 2023 15:23:27 +0800
From:   Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf: Add more syscalls to benchmark



On 01/07/2023 05:04 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 5:23 PM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/03/2022 05:19 PM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/10/2022 11:50 AM, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
>>>> Tested on x86_64, arm64, mips64 and loongarch64.
>>>>
>>>> Tiezhu Yang (4):
>>>>   tools x86: Keep list sorted by number in unistd_{32,64}.h
>>>>   perf bench syscall: Introduce bench_syscall_common()
>>>>   perf bench syscall: Add getpgid syscall benchmark
>>>>   perf bench syscall: Add execve syscall benchmark
>>>>
>>>>  tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h | 23 ++++++---
>>>>  tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h | 23 ++++++---
>>>>  tools/perf/bench/bench.h                    |  2 +
>>>>  tools/perf/bench/syscall.c                  | 76
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>  tools/perf/builtin-bench.c                  |  2 +
>>>>  5 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ping, any more comments?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Tiezhu
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> If this patch series has no value and is not acceptable,
>> or what should I do to update, please let me know.
>
> I'm so sorry about being late a lot.
> I don't have any objection to this series.
>
> For the execve bench, I think it's actually fork + execve
> then maybe it makes sense to have a fork only bench
> to compare the execve part precisely.
>
> But it can be added later, so
>
> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks,
> Namhyung
>

Hi Namhyung,

Thank you very much. I will submit another single patch
to benchmark fork after this series is applied.

Thanks,
Tiezhu