linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: allow more compatible combinations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230107150740.0ba34aa1@aktux>
Date:   Sat, 7 Jan 2023 15:07:40 +0100
From:   Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     ulf.hansson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mmc: fsl-imx-esdhc: allow more compatible
 combinations

On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 15:00:56 +0100
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:

[...]
> >> I asked to remove half-compatible. Not to enforce.
> >>  
so you are saying that allowing
compatible = "A", "B" 
is not ok, if B is not fully compatible. I agree with that
one.

> > well B is half-compatible, I (and others) have sent patches to remove,
> > but they were rejected. I consider these patches the way to go.  
> 
> No, they are not correct.
> 
Maybe there is some misunderstanding
"these patches" = e.g. 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/72e1194e10ccb4f87aed96265114f0963e805092.camel@pengutronix.de/

Regards,
Andreas