linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9da36d2c-2229-08a4-d78f-e789b93132b1@loongson.cn>
Date:   Sat, 7 Jan 2023 08:58:10 +0800
From:   Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] pipe: use __pipe_{lock,unlock} instead of spinlock

Hi Luis,

On 2023/1/7 上午3:13, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:48:44PM +0800, Hongchen Zhang wrote:
>> Use spinlock in pipe_read/write cost too much time,IMO
>> pipe->{head,tail} can be protected by __pipe_{lock,unlock}.
>> On the other hand, we can use __pipe_{lock,unlock} to protect
>> the pipe->{head,tail} in pipe_resize_ring and
>> post_one_notification.
>>
>> I tested this patch using UnixBench's pipe test case on a x86_64
>> machine,and get the following data:
>> 1) before this patch
>> System Benchmarks Partial Index  BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
>> Pipe Throughput                   12440.0     493023.3    396.3
>>                                                          ========
>> System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)              396.3
>>
>> 2) after this patch
>> System Benchmarks Partial Index  BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
>> Pipe Throughput                   12440.0     507551.4    408.0
>>                                                          ========
>> System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only)              408.0
>>
>> so we get ~3% speedup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hongchen Zhang <zhanghongchen@...ngson.cn>
>> ---
> 
> After the above "---" line you should have the changlog descrption.
> For instance:
> 
> v3:
>    - fixes bleh blah blah
> v2:
>    - fixes 0-day report by ... etc..
>    - fixes spelling or whatever
> 
> I cannot decipher what you did here differently, not do I want to go
> looking and diff'ing. So you are making the life of reviewer harder.
> 
>    Luis
> 
Matthew also reminded me to add the change log, but I don't think it is 
necessary to write the change log to fix the errors in the patch. 
Anyway, I think it is a good habit and will add these contents in the 
new v3 version.

Best Regards,
Hongchen Zhang