[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7nb2q6SDota/rTU@ravnborg.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 21:53:46 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg via B4 Submission Endpoint
<devnull+sam.ravnborg.org@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] video: fbdev: atmel_lcdfb: Rework backlight
handling
Hi Stephen.
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> On 7 January 2023 19:26:15 CET, Sam Ravnborg via B4 Submission Endpoint <devnull+sam.ravnborg.org@...nel.org> wrote:
> >From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> >
> >The atmel_lcdfb had code to save/restore power state.
> >This is not needed so drop it.
> >
> >Introduce backlight_is_brightness() to make logic simpler.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> >Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> >Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> >Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
> >Cc: linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
> >Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> >---
> > drivers/video/fbdev/atmel_lcdfb.c | 24 +++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
...
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> I’d submitted quite a few more of these previously (and you’d reviewed them), see e.g. the thread starting at https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/6/7/4365, and yesterday, https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/6/520, https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/6/656, https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/6/970, https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/6/643, and https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/6/680. There are a few more, I can find them if it’s any use.
The patches from yesterday was what triggered me to resurrect an old
branch of mine where I had done something similar. I had lost all
memory of reviewing similar patches from you.
Helge - could you pick the reviewed patches from:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220607192335.1137249-1-steve@sk2.org/
[This is the same mail as Stephen refer to above - looked up via lore].
Stephen - I expect Daniel/Lee to take care of the patches from yesterday.
If you can look up other pending patches from you please do so, so we
can have them applied.
Preferably with links to lore - as this makes it easier to apply them.
Review of what is unique in this set would be appreciated.
Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists