linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/6] riscv: mm: dma-noncoherent: Switch using function pointers for cache management

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 07 Jan 2023 22:52:55 +0100
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Conor Dooley" <conor@...nel.org>
Cc:     Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
        "Conor.Dooley" <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        guoren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        "Andrew Jones" <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
        "Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@...belt.com>,
        "Albert Ou" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        "open list:RISC-V ARCHITECTURE" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        "Philipp Tomsich" <philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu>,
        "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@...nel.org>,
        "Atish Patra" <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        "Anup Patel" <apatel@...tanamicro.com>,
        "Tsukasa OI" <research_trasio@....a4lg.com>,
        "Jisheng Zhang" <jszhang@...nel.org>,
        "Mayuresh Chitale" <mchitale@...tanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/6] riscv: mm: dma-noncoherent: Switch using function
 pointers for cache management

On Sat, Jan 7, 2023, at 00:29, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:31:33PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 6, 2023, at 19:55, Prabhakar wrote:
>> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>> > +struct riscv_cache_ops zicbom_cmo_ops = {
>> > +	.clean_range = &zicbom_cmo_clean_range,
>> > +	.inv_range = &zicbom_cmo_inval_range,
>> > +	.flush_range = &zicbom_cmo_flush_range,
>> > +};
>> > +#else
>> > +struct riscv_cache_ops zicbom_cmo_ops = {
>> > +	.clean_range = NULL,
>> > +	.inv_range = NULL,
>> > +	.flush_range = NULL,
>> > +	.riscv_dma_noncoherent_cmo_ops = NULL,
>> > +};
>> > +#endif
>> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(zicbom_cmo_ops);
>> 
>> Same here: If the ZICBOM ISA is disabled, nothing should
>> reference zicbom_cmo_ops.
>
>> Also, since ZICBOM is a standard
>> extension, I think it makes sense to always have it enabled,
>> at least whenever noncoherent DMA is supported, that way
>> it can be the default that gets used in the absence of any
>> nonstandard cache controller.
>
> While I think of it, this is not possible as Zicbom requires toolchain
> support whereas the alternative methods for non-coherent DMA do not.

Ah, I see. Would it be possible to use the same .long trick
as in the other ones though? Something like

#if CONFIG_AS_VERSION >= 23600 /* or whichever version */
     /* proper inline asm */
#else
     /* .long hack */
#endif

That way everyone can use it, and the hack would automatically
go away in a few years after linux requires a newer toolchain.

Alternatively, the entire noncoherent-dma support could be
made to depend on whichever toolchain introduced Zicbom.

     Arnd