[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <811a392a-d634-5557-dd58-57f1580e28f2@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2023 18:26:12 +0100
From: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg via B4 Submission Endpoint
<devnull+sam.ravnborg.org@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] video: fbdev: atmel_lcdfb: Rework backlight
handling
On 1/7/23 21:53, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Stephen.
>
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 09:36:47PM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
>> On 7 January 2023 19:26:15 CET, Sam Ravnborg via B4 Submission Endpoint <devnull+sam.ravnborg.org@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
>>>
>>> The atmel_lcdfb had code to save/restore power state.
>>> This is not needed so drop it.
>>>
>>> Introduce backlight_is_brightness() to make logic simpler.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
>>> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
>>> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
>>> Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
>>> Cc: linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>>> ---
>>> drivers/video/fbdev/atmel_lcdfb.c | 24 +++---------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> ...
>>
>> Hi Sam,
>>
>> I’d submitted quite a few more of these previously (and you’d reviewed them), see e.g. the thread starting at https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/6/7/4365, and yesterday, https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/6/520, https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/6/656, https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/6/970, https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/6/643, and https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/1/6/680. There are a few more, I can find them if it’s any use.
>
> The patches from yesterday was what triggered me to resurrect an old
> branch of mine where I had done something similar. I had lost all
> memory of reviewing similar patches from you.
>
>
> Helge - could you pick the reviewed patches from:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220607192335.1137249-1-steve@sk2.org/
> [This is the same mail as Stephen refer to above - looked up via lore].
I just pulled those 7 patches into fbdev/for-next.
If you need more, please let me know,
Thanks!
Helge
>
> Stephen - I expect Daniel/Lee to take care of the patches from yesterday.
> If you can look up other pending patches from you please do so, so we
> can have them applied.
> Preferably with links to lore - as this makes it easier to apply them.
>
> Review of what is unique in this set would be appreciated.
>
> Sam
Powered by blists - more mailing lists