[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2301082029541.65308@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2023 20:39:09 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Disable kernel stack offset randomization for
!TSC
On Sun, 8 Jan 2023, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > processor : 0
> > vendor_id : GenuineIntel
> > cpu family : 4
> > model : 3
> > model name : 486 DX/2
> > stepping : 5
>
> Real hw?
>
> If so, LOL, amazing that a box like that still even boots.
Why? I have slower non-x86 hardware that boots current Linux. This box
at least has 128MiB of RAM (I still look forward to doubling it if I find
the right modules) and boots quite quickly. It's portable (luggable) too.
> A modern phone is likely orders of magnitudes more powerful than this relic.
It doesn't provide the environment to verify that EISA FDDI networking
(defxx.c) continues to operate as expected though.
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists