linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/27] ARM: pxa: remove unused board files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 08 Jan 2023 22:20:55 +0100
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To:     "Dmitry Baryshkov" <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
Cc:     "Richard Purdie" <richard.purdie@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...nel.org>,
        "Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        "Daniel Mack" <daniel@...que.org>,
        "Haojian Zhuang" <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Ales Bardorfer" <ales@...ech.si>,
        "Ales Snuparek" <snuparek@...as.cz>,
        "Alex Osborne" <ato@...hy.org>,
        "Alex Osborne" <bobofdoom@...il.com>,
        "Dirk Opfer" <dirk@...er-online.de>, "Ian Molton" <spyro@....com>,
        "Lennert Buytenhek" <kernel@...tstofly.org>,
        "Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        "Michael Petchkovsky" <mkpetch@...ernode.on.net>,
        "Nick Bane" <nick@...omputing.co.uk>,
        "Paul Parsons" <lost.distance@...oo.com>,
        "Philipp Zabel" <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
        "Sergey Lapin" <slapin@...fans.org>,
        "Tomas Cech" <sleep_walker@...e.cz>,
        "Linus Walleij" <linusw@...nel.org>,
        "Marc Zyngier" <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] ARM: pxa: remove unused board files

On Sun, Jan 8, 2023, at 22:12, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> вс, 8 янв. 2023 г. в 23:05, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
>>
>> At least locomo and sa1111 are both private to mach-sa1100
>> now and no longer shared with pxa, so this should get
>> a little easier. When I had last looking into cleaning up
>> sa1100, my impression was that the main work would be converting
>> most of the drivers to use dynamic resources instead of
>> hardcoded addresses and interrupts. Looking at locomo again,
>> my feeling is that this could remain largely unchanged,
>> as the locomo downstream drivers (led, keyboard, lcd)
>> are already abstracted enough and locomo itself can
>> just be an mfd or soc driver.
>
> locomo has been used on Sharp Poodle, if I'm not mistaken. And sa1111
> is used on the lubbock, one of the crazy devkits.

Right, and both of these are on the way out.

      Arnd