[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2sfglh02h.fsf@free.fr>
Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2023 09:49:17 +0100
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/27] ARM: pxa: drop pxa310/pxa320/pxa93x support
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> writes:
> There is currently no devicetree support for any of these three
> SoCs, and no board files remain. As it seems unlikely that
> anyone
> is going to add DT support soon, let's drop the SoC specific
> code
> now.
Hi Arnd,
Here you're dropping pxa variant support. For the currently
"partly" working
boards in devicetree, such a zylonite, this will break their
current support.
For example the zylonite I have which is working on DT has a
pxa310 variant.
The cm-x300, which also works in DT, has a pxa320 variant.
What these boards need is their IO mappings and cpufreq to still
work after
your serie in DT. What bothers me are the changes to :
- drivers/clk/pxa/clk-pxa3xx.c
- drivers/cpufreq/pxa3xx-cpufreq.c
Here the clock changes will probably remove the clock provided to
specific
pxa310/pxa320 drivers for example.
I don't know how you want to proceed, yet this change will break
some pxa3xx
platforms.
Cheers.
--
Robert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists