[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230108114228.3szmdq32lt25zbtp@wittgenstein>
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2023 12:42:28 +0100
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix_acl: Use try_cmpxchg in get_acl
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:47:24AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 08:35:40PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > Use try_cmpxchg instead of cmpxchg (*ptr, old, new) == old
> > in get_acl. x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in ZF flag,
> > so this change saves a compare after cmpxchg (and related move
> > instruction in front of cmpxchg).
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
> > Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> > ---
>
> Looks ok to me. But it's not urgent so I'll circle back to this post
> -rc1.
Seems good to me. So if there are no objectsions, then applied, thanks!
[1/1] posix_acl: Use try_cmpxchg in get_acl
commit: 4e1da8fe031303599e78f88e0dad9f44272e4f99
Powered by blists - more mailing lists