linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Rename the local variables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2023 18:07:11 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To:     Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
        Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
        Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>,
        Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>,
        Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/10] mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Rename the local variables

On Mon, 26 Dec 2022, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:

> Local variables directly interact with dev_get_drvdata/dev_set_drvdata
> should be named ddata.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>

It took 2 people to rename some variables? :)

> Signed-off-by: Tianfei zhang <tianfei.zhang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c
> index 12c522c16d83..2c26203c4799 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c
> @@ -81,15 +81,15 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(bmcfw_version);
>  static ssize_t mac_address_show(struct device *dev,
>  				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
> -	struct intel_m10bmc *max10 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct intel_m10bmc *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);

In general I'm all for the use of 'ddata' for driver data.

For my own reference (apply this as-is to your sign-off block):
                                                       
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>

>  	unsigned int macaddr_low, macaddr_high;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = m10bmc_sys_read(max10, M10BMC_MAC_LOW, &macaddr_low);
> +	ret = m10bmc_sys_read(ddata, M10BMC_MAC_LOW, &macaddr_low);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	ret = m10bmc_sys_read(max10, M10BMC_MAC_HIGH, &macaddr_high);
> +	ret = m10bmc_sys_read(ddata, M10BMC_MAC_HIGH, &macaddr_high);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -106,11 +106,11 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(mac_address);
>  static ssize_t mac_count_show(struct device *dev,
>  			      struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
> -	struct intel_m10bmc *max10 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	struct intel_m10bmc *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>  	unsigned int macaddr_high;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = m10bmc_sys_read(max10, M10BMC_MAC_HIGH, &macaddr_high);
> +	ret = m10bmc_sys_read(ddata, M10BMC_MAC_HIGH, &macaddr_high);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]