lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153c451a-029f-ef03-7a57-7ff0394ac3d8@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2023 12:01:45 -0800
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
CC:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        <tsahu@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable 8/8] mm/hugetlb: convert demote_free_huge_page
 to folios

On 1/9/23 10:23, Mike Kravetz wrote:
>>>>> No problems with the code, but I am not in love with the name subfolio.
>>>>> I know it is patterned after 'subpage'.  For better or worse, the term
>>>>> subpage is used throughout the kernel.  This would be the first usage of
>>>>> the term 'subfolio'.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matthew do you have any comments on the naming?  It is local to hugetlb,
>>>>> but I would hate to see use of the term subfolio based on its introduction
>>>>> here.
>>>>
>>>> I'm really not a fan of it either.  I intended to dive into this patch
>>>> and understand the function it's modifying, in the hopes of suggesting
>>>> a better name and/or method.
>>>
>>> At a high level, this routine is splitting a very large folio (1G for
>>> example) into multiple large folios of a smaller size (512 2M folios for
>>> example).  The loop is iterating through the very large folio at
>>> increments of the smaller large folio.  subfolio (previously subpage) is
>>> used to point to the smaller large folio within the loop.
>>>
>> If folio does not need to be part of the variable name, how about something
>> like 'demote_target'? The prep call inside the loop would then look like:
>>
>> prep_new_hugetlb_folio(target_hstate, demote_target, nid);
>>
>> so it is still clear that demote_target is a folio. A more concise version
>> could also be 'demote_dst' but that seems more ambiguous than target.
> 
> I am OK with that naming.  Primary concern was the introduction of the
> term subfolio.

How about one of these:

     smaller_folio
     inner_folio

Those are more self-explanatory, while still avoiding "subfolio".

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ