linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/15] video: fbdev: atmel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230109210338.42c993bd@heffalump.sk2.org>
Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2023 21:03:38 +0100
From:   Stephen Kitt <steve@....org>
To:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg via B4 Submission Endpoint 
        <devnull+sam.ravnborg.org@...nel.org>,
        Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/15] video: fbdev: atmel_lcdfb: Rework backlight
 handling

On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 20:53:44 +0100, Stephen Kitt <steve@....org> wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 21:24:20 +0100, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> > > Here are my pending patches from last June on lore:
> > >     
> > 
> > All patches are handled I think except this:  
> > > * https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220608205623.2106113-1-steve@sk2.org/
> > >   
> > 
> > Can I ask you to drop the assignment that is not needed, and resend with
> > the collected acks/r-b.
> > 
> > With this, then all fbdev patches are handled.  
> 
> Ah yes, it was revised as
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220609180440.3138625-1-steve@sk2.org/ which
> only got one ack (from you,
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YqJCKQmQEuVsbspK@ravnborg.org/). Should I
> resend that or is that usable as-is? Or would it be better if I sent all the
> fbdev patches again (collecting all the acks and reviews)?

Since the others are already in fbdev/for-next, I’ve just resent v2 of this
patch with your ack.

Regards,

Stephen

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped