[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7yCCNANVBnOOmxM@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:07:20 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
Cc: corbet@....net, reinette.chatre@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
peterz@...radead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
sandipan.das@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bagasdotme@...il.com, eranian@...gle.com,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, jarkko@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, quic_jiles@...cinc.com,
peternewman@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 04/13] x86/cpufeatures: Add Bandwidth Monitoring
Event Configuration feature flag
On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 01:49:09PM -0600, Moger, Babu wrote:
> All the QoS(or RDT) features are visible so far. If we make them visible,
> users can easily figure out if this specific feature is supported or not.
What would be the actual, real-life use case where the presence of those flags
in /proc/cpuinfo is really needed?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists