linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] nolibc: add support for the s390 platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:04:38 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] nolibc: add support for the s390 platform

On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:15:34AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 09:09:06AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hello Paul,
> > 
> > this series adds support for the s390x platform to nolibc and rcutorture,
> > reducing the init size from ~600kB to ~1kB. The work was contributed by
> > Sven Schnelle. It depends on the fixes series I sent previously:
> > 
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230109075442.25963-1-w@1wt.eu/
> > 
> > It passes the self-tests correctly and the patches are clean, please
> > consider queuing it.
> 
> "80 test(s) passed" and successful exit code.  I will assume that the
> decrease in tests from 81 to 80 is intended.  I have these queued,
> but it may be some hours before they are externally visible.

And I have now updated the -rcu "nolibc" branch to point to the fixes
and the s390 enablement.  Please let me know if I missed anything.

							Thanx, Paul