lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon,  9 Jan 2023 23:07:50 +0000
From:   SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To:     Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>
Cc:     SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
        "maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org" <maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 22/44] mmap: Pass through vmi iterator to __split_vma()

Hello Liam,

On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 20:30:50 +0000 Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com> wrote:

> * SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> [230109 14:28]:
> > On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:45:46 +0000 Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > * SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> [230106 21:40]:
> > > > Hello Liam,
> > > > 
> > > > On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 02:01:26 +0000 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hello Liam,
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I found 'make install' mm-unstable kernel fails from initramfs stage with
> > > > > 'not a dynamic executable' message.  I confirmed the issue is not reproducible
> > > > > before your patchset[1] but after the series[2].
> > > > > 
> > > > > I tried to bisect, but on a commit[3] middle of mm-unstable tree which this
> > > > > patch is applied, I get below error while booting.  Do you have an idea?
> > > > 
> > > > I further bisected for the boot failure.  The first bad commit was a8e0f2e12936
> > > > ("mmap: change do_mas_munmap and do_mas_aligned_munmap() to use vma
> > > > iterator")[1].  The stacktrace on the commit is as below.
> > > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your work on this.
> > > 
> > > I have found the issue and will send out a fix shortly.  I am not
> > > handling the invalidated state correctly in the write path.
> > 
> > Thank you, I tested the patch and confirmed it is fixing the boot failure.  The
> > 'make install' issue on my system is not fixed yet, though.  While doing bisect
> > of the issue again with your boot failure fix, I found below build failure on a
> > commit applying a patch of this series, namely "userfaultfd: use vma iterator".
> > 
> >     mm/madvise.c: In function ‘madvise_update_vma’:
> >     mm/madvise.c:165:11: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__split_vma’; did you mean ‘split_vma’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >       165 |   error = __split_vma(mm, vma, start, 1);
> >           |           ^~~~~~~~~~~
> >           |           split_vma
> >     cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > 
> > Maybe "mm: add temporary vma iterator versions of vma_merge(), split_vma(), and
> > __split_vma()" caused the build failure?
> 
> Yes, it seems I removed the external declaration before the function.
> Thanks.

I continued bisect with your fix for this[1], and found my 'make install' issue
comes from 'mm: change mprotect_fixup to vma iterator'.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230109205300.955019-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com/


Thanks,
SJ

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ