[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7bf366a-dc32-47a2-79fc-c6f7f1f93ab7@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 13:50:08 +0530
From: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>, <robdclark@...il.com>,
<quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, <sean@...rly.run>,
<airlied@...il.com>, <daniel@...ll.ch>,
<marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<dianders@...omium.org>, <marex@...x.de>,
<vladimir.lypak@...il.com>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dsi: Add missing check for
alloc_ordered_workqueue
On 09/01/23 08:20, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> Add check for the return value of alloc_ordered_workqueue as it may return
> NULL pointer and cause NULL pointer dereference.
> Moreover, change the "goto fail" into "return ret" and drop the "fail"
> label since they are the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>
> Changelog:
>
> v1 -> v2:
>
> 1. Change the "goto fail" into "return ret" and drop the "fail" label.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> index 89aadd3b3202..819f5be5fd77 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> @@ -1884,7 +1884,7 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
> msm_host = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*msm_host), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!msm_host) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> msm_host->pdev = pdev;
> @@ -1893,14 +1893,14 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
> ret = dsi_host_parse_dt(msm_host);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: failed to parse dt\n", __func__);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> msm_host->ctrl_base = msm_ioremap_size(pdev, "dsi_ctrl", &msm_host->ctrl_size);
> if (IS_ERR(msm_host->ctrl_base)) {
> pr_err("%s: unable to map Dsi ctrl base\n", __func__);
> ret = PTR_ERR(msm_host->ctrl_base);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -1909,7 +1909,7 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
> if (!msm_host->cfg_hnd) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> pr_err("%s: get config failed\n", __func__);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
> cfg = msm_host->cfg_hnd->cfg;
>
> @@ -1917,7 +1917,7 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
> if (msm_host->id < 0) {
> ret = msm_host->id;
> pr_err("%s: unable to identify DSI host index\n", __func__);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /* fixup base address by io offset */
> @@ -1927,19 +1927,19 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
> cfg->regulator_data,
> &msm_host->supplies);
> if (ret)
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
>
> ret = dsi_clk_init(msm_host);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: unable to initialize dsi clks\n", __func__);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> msm_host->rx_buf = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, SZ_4K, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!msm_host->rx_buf) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> pr_err("%s: alloc rx temp buf failed\n", __func__);
> - goto fail;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> ret = devm_pm_opp_set_clkname(&pdev->dev, "byte");
> @@ -1977,15 +1977,17 @@ int msm_dsi_host_init(struct msm_dsi *msm_dsi)
>
> /* setup workqueue */
> msm_host->workqueue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("dsi_drm_work", 0);
> + if (!msm_host->workqueue) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + return ret;
Why not simply return -ENOMEM;
instead?
> + }
> +
> INIT_WORK(&msm_host->err_work, dsi_err_worker);
>
> msm_dsi->id = msm_host->id;
>
> DBG("Dsi Host %d initialized", msm_host->id);
> return 0;
> -
> -fail:
> - return ret;
> }
>
> void msm_dsi_host_destroy(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
--
Thanks and Regards,
Dhruva Gole
Powered by blists - more mailing lists