[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f6a4b1e0a5a85f6e2e9f674bc88843c5ab623c6.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 09:45:04 +0100
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
kernel test robot <yujie.liu@...el.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [niks:has_ioport_v3] [tty] aa0652d7f1:
BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address
On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 09:03 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023, at 06:54, kernel test robot wrote:
> > Greeting,
> >
> > FYI, we noticed BUG:kernel_NULL_pointer_dereference,address due to
> > commit (built with clang-14):
> >
> > commit: aa0652d7f1b311e55232a8153522fdaaba0f197a ("tty: serial: handle
> > HAS_IOPORT dependencies")
> > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/niks/linux.git
> > has_ioport_v3
> >
> > in testcase: boot
> >
> > on test machine: qemu-system-i386 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 4G
> >
> > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire
> > log/backtrace):
> >
> >
> > [ 2.166733][ T0] calling univ8250_console_init+0x0/0x30 @ 0
> > [ 2.167555][ T0] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
> > 00000000
>
> I think it's this bit:
>
> @@ -508,12 +523,13 @@ static void set_io_from_upio(struct uart_port *p)
> up->dl_read = au_serial_dl_read;
> up->dl_write = au_serial_dl_write;
> break;
> -#endif
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
> default:
> p->serial_in = io_serial_in;
> p->serial_out = io_serial_out;
> break;
> +#endif
> +#endif
> }
> /* Remember loaded iotype */
> up->cur_iotype = p->iotype;
>
>
> which puts the 'default' case inside of '#ifdef
> CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_RT288X'. x86 does not use the
> RT288x variant but relies on the default, so any
> call to io_serial_{in,out} will cause a NULL
> pointer dereference.
>
> Arnd
Thanks for looking into it Arnd, your reasoning makes sense to me, I'll
try to look into this and test this case before I sent out the v3 of
the HAS_IOPORT patches. I still also have a few nitpicks from Bjorn,
mostly about the commit messages, to work in. Hope to do that soon but
got a few things going on at the moment.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists