lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6b4780f5366de7f0dd59da0ed4f9a948@walle.cc>
Date:   Mon, 09 Jan 2023 15:20:23 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     "Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Cc:     "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@...nel.org>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: macronix: add support for mx77l51250f

Am 2023-01-09 15:09, schrieb Usyskin, Alexander:
>> > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/macronix.c
>> > @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ static const struct flash_info macronix_nor_parts[]
>> > = {
>> >  	{ "mx66u2g45g",	 INFO(0xc2253c, 0, 64 * 1024, 4096)
>> >  		NO_SFDP_FLAGS(SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_DUAL_READ |
>> SPI_NOR_QUAD_READ)
>> >  		FIXUP_FLAGS(SPI_NOR_4B_OPCODES) },
>> > +	{ "mx77l51250f", INFO(0xc2751a, 0, 64 * 1024, 4096)
>> > +		PARSE_SFDP },
>> 
>> With the newest generic spi nor driver [1] this patch shouldn't
>> be needed at all anymore. Could you verify, that your flash will work
>> without it?
>> 
>> -michael
>> 
>> [1]
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.2-rc3/source/drivers/mtd/spi-
>> nor/core.c#L1637
> 
> Tested now, the v6.2-rc3 recognizes the chip.
> Does this mean that all SFDP-supporting chips will be recognized 
> automatically?

As long as you just want to use the standard features described by SFDP,
yes. There might be lacking support for some SFDP features, though. 
These
should then be added to the SFDP parser.

But, there are also features, which aren't supported by SFDP, i.e. 
locking
or OTP. If you want to use these, you still need a flash table entry.

-michael

> Tomas, we can abandon upstreaming effort, I'll save the patch if it
> will needed by older kernel versions.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ