[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y7wr08Zs/sSjWizU@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:59:31 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: Dhrystone -- userland version
Hi!
> > > However, as this is not Linux-specific, how hard can it be to convince
> > > your distro to include https://github.com/qris/dhrystone-deb.git?
> > > Usually, when I have a full userspace available, I just clone the above,
> > > and debuild it myself.
> >
> > Dunno. I'd not solve it if package was in Debian, but it is not.
>
> I would suspect the better long-term solution would be to get the
> package into Debian, since that will be easier for people to use. I
> suspect the reason why most distros don't include it is because it
> really is a **terrible** benchmark for most use cases.
Yeah, so... every benchmark is terrible. Is this one worse than most?
I tried benchmarking using:
time factor $[65863223*65863159]
- but that's division test, not a CPU test, and there are two
versions of factor floating around
time cat /dev/urandom | head -c 10000000 | bzip2 -9 - | wc -c
- but that seems to be memory test, not a CPU test.
Dhrystone seems to be making some kind of comeback in RISC-V land. Is
there something better? Something better that is still reasonably small?
Best regards,
Pavel
--
People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists