[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d1cd7ca1f2ea0f022af1d43999a61e6b17685c0.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 10:25:13 -0500
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] fuse: Convert fuse_flush() to use
file_check_and_advance_wb_err()
On Mon, 2023-01-09 at 05:18 +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> As with fsync, use the newer file_check_and_advance_wb_err() instead
> of filemap_check_errors().
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> ---
> fs/fuse/file.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
> index 875314ee6f59..7174646ddf09 100644
> --- a/fs/fuse/file.c
> +++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
> @@ -500,11 +500,10 @@ static int fuse_flush(struct file *file, fl_owner_t id)
> fuse_sync_writes(inode);
> inode_unlock(inode);
>
> - err = filemap_check_errors(file->f_mapping);
> + err = file_check_and_advance_wb_err(file);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
>
I think it'd be best to not advance the f_wb_err here. ->flush is called
on filp_close which is mainly close() syscalls, but there are some other
callers too, and an error reported by ->flush can be discarded.
>
> - err = 0;
> if (fm->fc->no_flush)
> goto inval_attr_out;
>
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists