[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230109165244.yck7ik26xb4zwtil@mobilestation>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 19:52:44 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ive.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
jude.onyenegecha@...ive.com, ben.dooks@...ive.com,
jeegar.lakhani@...ive.com, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/15] spi: dw: update NDF while using enhanced spi
mode
On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 06:07:19PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> If the transfer of Transmit only mode is using dual/quad/octal SPI then
> NDF needs to be updated with the number of data frames.
> If the Transmit FIFO goes empty in-between, DWC_ssi masks the serial
> clock and wait for rest of the data until the programmed amount of
> frames are transferred successfully.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ive.com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
> index 77c23772bb3d9..8c47a4d14b666 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
> @@ -346,7 +346,9 @@ void dw_spi_update_config(struct dw_spi *dws, struct spi_device *spi,
> dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_CTRLR0, cr0);
>
> if (cfg->tmode == DW_SPI_CTRLR0_TMOD_EPROMREAD ||
> - cfg->tmode == DW_SPI_CTRLR0_TMOD_RO)
> + cfg->tmode == DW_SPI_CTRLR0_TMOD_RO ||
> + (cfg->tmode == DW_SPI_CTRLR0_TMOD_TO &&
> + cfg->spi_frf != DW_SPI_CTRLR0_SPI_FRF_STD_SPI))
First CTRLR1.NDF is meaningful for the Tx-only mode if non-zero eSPI
mode is enabled and the clock-stretching feature is activated. Second
the conditional statement already looks too bulky. Adding new parts
will make it even harder to read. What about converting it to
something like:
< if (cfg->ndf)
< dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_CTRLR1, cfg->ndf - 1);
What do you think?
-Serge(y)
> dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_CTRLR1, cfg->ndf ? cfg->ndf - 1 : 0);
>
> /* Note DW APB SSI clock divider doesn't support odd numbers */
> --
> 2.30.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists