lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4200ae1de7324fcddac201009a43571d0a72104.1673343994.git.drv@mailo.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 23:45:40 +0530
From:   Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
To:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
        Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/i915/fbc: Avoid full proxy f_ops for FBC debug
 attributes

Using DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE macro with the debugfs_create_file()
function adds the overhead of introducing a proxy file operation
functions to wrap the original read/write inside file removal protection
functions. This adds significant overhead in terms of introducing and
managing the proxy factory file operations structure and function
wrapping at runtime.
As a replacement, a combination of DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE macro paired
with debugfs_create_file_unsafe() is suggested to be used instead.  The
DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE utilises debugfs_file_get() and
debugfs_file_put() wrappers to protect the original read and write
function calls for the debug attributes. There is no need for any
runtime proxy file operations to be managed by the debugfs core.
Following coccicheck make command helped identify this change:

make coccicheck M=drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ MODE=patch COCCI=./scripts/coccinelle/api/debugfs/debugfs_simple_attr.cocci

Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>
---
Changes in v2:
   - Include coccicheck make command in the patch log message for clarity.
     Suggested by Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>


 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
index 5e69d3c11d21..c508dcf415b4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
@@ -1807,10 +1807,10 @@ static int intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_set(void *data, u64 val)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops,
-			intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_get,
-			intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_set,
-			"%llu\n");
+DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops,
+			 intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_get,
+			 intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_set,
+			 "%llu\n");
 
 static void intel_fbc_debugfs_add(struct intel_fbc *fbc,
 				  struct dentry *parent)
@@ -1819,8 +1819,8 @@ static void intel_fbc_debugfs_add(struct intel_fbc *fbc,
 			    fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_status_fops);
 
 	if (fbc->funcs->set_false_color)
-		debugfs_create_file("i915_fbc_false_color", 0644, parent,
-				    fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops);
+		debugfs_create_file_unsafe("i915_fbc_false_color", 0644, parent,
+					   fbc, &intel_fbc_debugfs_false_color_fops);
 }
 
 void intel_fbc_crtc_debugfs_add(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
-- 
2.34.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ