linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] memcg: Track exported dma-buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABdmKX3hBX1O8fJ2Zz0ajL=f+tROqWe-Kzr7oPjs46qBYBXV1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 11:08:04 -0800
From:   "T.J. Mercier" <tjmercier@...gle.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, android-mm@...gle.com, jstultz@...gle.com,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] memcg: Track exported dma-buffers

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:58 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon 09-01-23 21:38:04, T.J. Mercier wrote:
> > When a buffer is exported to userspace, use memcg to attribute the
> > buffer to the allocating cgroup until all buffer references are
> > released.
> >
> > Unlike the dmabuf sysfs stats implementation, this memcg accounting
> > avoids contention over the kernfs_rwsem incurred when creating or
> > removing nodes.
>
> I am not familiar with dmabuf infrastructure so please bear with me.
> AFAIU this patch adds a dmabuf specific counter to find out the amount
> of dmabuf memory used. But I do not see any actual charging implemented
> for that memory.
>
> I have looked at two random users of dma_buf_export cma_heap_allocate
> and it allocates pages to back the dmabuf (AFAIU) by cma_alloc
> which doesn't account to memcg, system_heap_allocate uses
> alloc_largest_available which relies on order_flags which doesn't seem
> to ever use __GFP_ACCOUNT.
>
> This would mean that the counter doesn't represent any actual memory
> reflected in the overall memory consumption of a memcg. I believe this
> is rather unexpected and confusing behavior. While some counters
> overlap and their sum would exceed the charged memory we do not have any
> that doesn't correspond to any memory (at least not for non-root memcgs).
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs

Thank you, that behavior is not intentional. I'm not looking at the
overall memcg charge yet otherwise I would have noticed this. I think
I understand what's needed for the charging part, but Shakeel
mentioned some additional work for "reclaim, OOM and charge context
and failure cases" on the cover letter which I need to look into.