| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20230110202632.2533978-6-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 21:26:27 +0100
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 05/10] KVM: s390: selftest: memop: Move testlist into main
This allows checking if the necessary requirements for a test case are
met via an arbitrary expression. In particular, it is easy to check if
certain bits are set in the memop extension capability.
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 131 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
index df1c726294b2..bbc191a13760 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
@@ -690,85 +690,86 @@ static void test_errors(void)
kvm_vm_free(t.kvm_vm);
}
-struct testdef {
- const char *name;
- void (*test)(void);
- int extension;
-} testlist[] = {
- {
- .name = "simple copy",
- .test = test_copy,
- },
- {
- .name = "generic error checks",
- .test = test_errors,
- },
- {
- .name = "copy with storage keys",
- .test = test_copy_key,
- .extension = 1,
- },
- {
- .name = "copy with key storage protection override",
- .test = test_copy_key_storage_prot_override,
- .extension = 1,
- },
- {
- .name = "copy with key fetch protection",
- .test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot,
- .extension = 1,
- },
- {
- .name = "copy with key fetch protection override",
- .test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override,
- .extension = 1,
- },
- {
- .name = "error checks with key",
- .test = test_errors_key,
- .extension = 1,
- },
- {
- .name = "termination",
- .test = test_termination,
- .extension = 1,
- },
- {
- .name = "error checks with key storage protection override",
- .test = test_errors_key_storage_prot_override,
- .extension = 1,
- },
- {
- .name = "error checks without key fetch prot override",
- .test = test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled,
- .extension = 1,
- },
- {
- .name = "error checks with key fetch prot override",
- .test = test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled,
- .extension = 1,
- },
-};
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int extension_cap, idx;
TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_has_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP));
+ extension_cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION);
- ksft_print_header();
+ struct testdef {
+ const char *name;
+ void (*test)(void);
+ bool requirements_met;
+ } testlist[] = {
+ {
+ .name = "simple copy",
+ .test = test_copy,
+ .requirements_met = true,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "generic error checks",
+ .test = test_errors,
+ .requirements_met = true,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "copy with storage keys",
+ .test = test_copy_key,
+ .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "copy with key storage protection override",
+ .test = test_copy_key_storage_prot_override,
+ .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "copy with key fetch protection",
+ .test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot,
+ .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "copy with key fetch protection override",
+ .test = test_copy_key_fetch_prot_override,
+ .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "error checks with key",
+ .test = test_errors_key,
+ .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "termination",
+ .test = test_termination,
+ .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "error checks with key storage protection override",
+ .test = test_errors_key_storage_prot_override,
+ .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "error checks without key fetch prot override",
+ .test = test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_not_enabled,
+ .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0,
+ },
+ {
+ .name = "error checks with key fetch prot override",
+ .test = test_errors_key_fetch_prot_override_enabled,
+ .requirements_met = extension_cap > 0,
+ },
+ };
+ ksft_print_header();
ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(testlist));
- extension_cap = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_S390_MEM_OP_EXTENSION);
for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(testlist); idx++) {
- if (extension_cap >= testlist[idx].extension) {
+ if (testlist[idx].requirements_met) {
testlist[idx].test();
ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", testlist[idx].name);
} else {
- ksft_test_result_skip("%s - extension level %d not supported\n",
- testlist[idx].name,
- testlist[idx].extension);
+ ksft_test_result_skip("%s - requirements not met (kernel has extension cap %#x)\n",
+ testlist[idx].name, extension_cap);
}
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists