[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230110-arm64-bti-selftest-skip-v1-0-143ecdc84567@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 20:49:58 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] kselftest/arm64: Improvements to BTI tests on non-BTI systems
While looking at the BTI selftest results on a non-BTI system I noticed
that not only are we printing invalid test numbers in that case, we're
skipping running the tests entirely even though there's a well defined
ABI we could be verifying and the code already knows what the results
should be.
The first patch here is a fix to the reporting of test numbers when
skipping, the second one just removes the skipping entirely in favour of
a runtime check for what the result of a BTI binary should be.
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
Mark Brown (2):
kselftest/arm64: Fix test numbering when skipping tests
kselftest/arm64: Run BTI selftests on systems without BTI
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/bti/test.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: b7bfaa761d760e72a969d116517eaa12e404c262
change-id: 20230110-arm64-bti-selftest-skip-9fdf5e94fb62
Best regards,
--
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists