linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] tty: serial: dz: convert atomic_* to refcount_* APIs for map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB575088A17680C124D6B9EB73E7FF9@DM8PR11MB5750.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 07:27:44 +0000
From:   "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
To:     Deepak R Varma <drv@...lo.com>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
CC:     "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Saurabh Singh Sengar <ssengar@...rosoft.com>,
        Praveen Kumar <kumarpraveen@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        "ishkamiel@...il.com" <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "dwindsor@...il.com" <dwindsor@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/2] tty: serial: dz: convert atomic_* to refcount_*
 APIs for map_guard

 
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 09:59:52AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > On 26. 12. 22, 7:21, Deepak R Varma wrote:
> > > The refcount_* APIs are designed to address known issues with the
> > > atomic_t APIs for reference counting. They provide following distinct
> > > advantages
> > >     - protect the reference counters from overflow/underflow
> > >     - avoid use-after-free errors
> > >     - provide improved memory ordering guarantee schemes
> > >     - neater and safer.
> >
> > Really? (see below)
> >
> > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/dz.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/dz.c
> > ...
> > > @@ -687,23 +686,19 @@ static int dz_map_port(struct uart_port *uport)
> > >   static int dz_request_port(struct uart_port *uport)
> > >   {
> > >   	struct dz_mux *mux = to_dport(uport)->mux;
> > > -	int map_guard;
> > >   	int ret;
> > >
> > > -	map_guard = atomic_add_return(1, &mux->map_guard);
> > > -	if (map_guard == 1) {
> > > -		if (!request_mem_region(uport->mapbase, dec_kn_slot_size,
> > > -					"dz")) {
> > > -			atomic_add(-1, &mux->map_guard);
> > > -			printk(KERN_ERR
> > > -			       "dz: Unable to reserve MMIO resource\n");
> > > +	refcount_inc(&mux->map_guard);
> > > +	if (refcount_read(&mux->map_guard) == 1) {
> >
> > This is now racy, right?
> 
> Hello Jiri,
> I found this [1] commit which introduced similar transformation in a
> neighbouring driver. Can you please comment how is this different from the
> current patch proposal?
> 
> [1] commit ID: 22a33651a56f ("convert sbd_duart.map_guard from atomic_t to
> refcount_t")
> 
> On a side note, I have not been able to find an exact 1:1 map to the
> atomic_add_result API. I am wondering should we have one?

In past we have decided not to provide this API for refcount_t
because for truly correctly behaving reference counters it should not be needed
(vs atomics that cover a broader range of use cases). 
Can you use !refcount_inc_not_zero in the above case?

Best Regards,
Elena.