linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: ramp_controller: Make things static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:03:26 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: ramp_controller: Make things static

Il 10/01/23 05:20, Bjorn Andersson ha scritto:
> The five msm8976_cfg_* objects ought to be static, as reported by LKP
> and sparse, fix this.
> 
> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c:235:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'msm8976_cfg_dfs_sid' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c:246:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'msm8976_cfg_link_sid' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c:250:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'msm8976_cfg_lmh_sid' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c:256:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'msm8976_cfg_ramp_en' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c:262:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'msm8976_cfg_ramp_dis' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Fixes: a723c95fa137 ("soc: qcom: Add Qualcomm Ramp Controller driver")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>

Thanks for catching that and swiftly fixing it!

Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>

Cheers,
Angelo