[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61ae2f3a-0c2b-5e18-3040-e7ad08bbf08c@collabora.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:03:26 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: ramp_controller: Make things static
Il 10/01/23 05:20, Bjorn Andersson ha scritto:
> The five msm8976_cfg_* objects ought to be static, as reported by LKP
> and sparse, fix this.
>
> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c:235:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'msm8976_cfg_dfs_sid' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c:246:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'msm8976_cfg_link_sid' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c:250:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'msm8976_cfg_lmh_sid' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c:256:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'msm8976_cfg_ramp_en' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/soc/qcom/ramp_controller.c:262:27: sparse: sparse: symbol 'msm8976_cfg_ramp_dis' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Fixes: a723c95fa137 ("soc: qcom: Add Qualcomm Ramp Controller driver")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@...cinc.com>
Thanks for catching that and swiftly fixing it!
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Cheers,
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists