[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230109164959.cb0cb7b3f8a4ba5a2051529a@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 16:49:59 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
willy@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable] mm: remove the hugetlb field from struct
page
On Mon, 9 Jan 2023 17:08:06 -0600 Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com> wrote:
> commit dad6a5eb5556(mm,hugetlb: use folio fields in second tail page)
> added a transitional hugetlb field to struct page and struct folio to make
> room for another int in the first tail of a compound page. Hugetlb folio
> conversions have changed all page users of this field to use the fields
> within the folio so struct page no longer needs this hugetlb specific
> field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
> ---
> This is rebased on 01/09/2023 mm-unstable plus Matthew's series[1] applied
>
> [1]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20221231214610.2800682-1-willy@infradead.org/
Matthew's series had some compilation issues and needs quite some
rework to make it apply to current mm-unstable..
So, please resend this patch once v2 of "Get rid of first tail page
fields" has materialized.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists