[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1653609a-42af-b7cd-9d30-fb2bd5721080@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:38:58 +0100
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"Michael Kelley (LINUX)" <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with pat_enable() and commit 72cbc8f04fe2
On 10.01.2023 06:59, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 10.01.23 06:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> On 09.01.23 19:28, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote:
>>> I've come across a case with a VM running on Hyper-V that doesn't get
>>> MTRRs, but the PAT is functional. (This is a Confidential VM using
>>> AMD's SEV-SNP encryption technology with the vTOM option.) In this
>>> case, the changes in commit 72cbc8f04fe2 ("x86/PAT: Have pat_enabled()
>>> properly reflect state when running on Xen") apply. pat_enabled() returns
>>> "true", but the MTRRs are not enabled.
>>>
>>> But with this commit, there's a problem. Consider memremap() on a RAM
>>> region, called with MEMREMAP_WB plus MEMREMAP_DEC as the 3rd
>>> argument. Because of the request for a decrypted mapping,
>>> arch_memremap_can_ram_remap() returns false, and a new mapping
>>> must be created, which is appropriate.
>>>
>>> The following call stack results:
>>>
>>> memremap()
>>> arch_memremap_wb()
>>> ioremap_cache()
>>> __ioremap_caller()
>>> memtype_reserve() <--- pcm is _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_WB
>>> pat_x_mtrr_type() <-- only called after commit 72cbc8f04fe2
>>>
>>> pat_x_mtrr_type() returns _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_UC_MINUS because
>>> mtrr_type_lookup() fails. As a result, memremap() erroneously creates the
>>> new mapping as uncached. This uncached mapping is causing a significant
>>> performance problem in certain Hyper-V Confidential VM configurations.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on resolving this? Should memtype_reserve() be checking
>>> both pat_enabled() *and* whether MTRRs are enabled before calling
>>> pat_x_mtrr_type()? Or does that defeat the purpose of commit
>>> 72cbc8f04fe2 in the Xen environment?
>>
>> I think pat_x_mtrr_type() should return _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_UC_MINUS only if
>> mtrr_type_lookup() is not failing and is returning a mode other than WB.
I agree.
> Another idea would be to let the mtrr_type_lookup() stub in
> arch/x86/include/asm/mtrr.h return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK, enabling to simplify
> pud_set_huge() and pmd_set_huge() by removing the check for MTRR_TYPE_INVALID.
But that has a risk of ending up misleading: When there are no MTRRs, there
simply is no default type (in the absence of inspecting other criteria).
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists