linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] dm: call dm_zone_endio after the target endio callback for zoned devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230110094316.GA14143@lst.de>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:43:16 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, axboe@...nel.dk,
        kernel@...kajraghav.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        hare@...e.de, bvanassche@....org, snitzer@...nel.org,
        dm-devel@...hat.com, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        gost.dev@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] dm: call dm_zone_endio after the target endio
 callback for zoned devices

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:07:39AM +0100, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> I just extracted the cleanup from my old series. Do you think it is better
> to send it as a separate patch instead of adding it along in this series?

dm and block have different maintainers.  So unless there is a
dependency it's better to split the patches out.