linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] rtw88: Four fixes found while working on SDIO support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87mt6qfvb1.fsf@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 14:06:26 +0200
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Cc:     Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>,
        "linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "tony0620emma\@gmail.com" <tony0620emma@...il.com>,
        "tehuang\@realtek.com" <tehuang@...ltek.com>,
        "s.hauer\@pengutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rtw88: Four fixes found while working on SDIO support

Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com> writes:

> Hi Ping-Ke,
>
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 10:26 AM Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> > Martin Blumenstingl (4):
>> >   rtw88: Add packed attribute to the eFuse structs
>>
>> I think this patch depends on another patchset or oppositely.
>> Please point that out for reviewers.
>
> There are no dependencies for this smaller individual series other
> than Linux 6.2-rc1 (as this has USB support). I made sure to not
> include any of the SDIO changes in this series.
> The idea is that it can be applied individually and make it either
> into 6.2-rc2 (or newer) or -next (6.3).

BTW wireless-next or wireless-testing are the preferred baselines for
wireless patches. Of course you can use other trees if you really want,
but please try to make sure they apply to wireless-next. Conflicts are
always extra churn I would prefer to avoid.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches