[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230110121754.2olqdzbe7wst3u4n@mercury.elektranox.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:17:54 +0100
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Jagan Teki <jagan@...eble.ai>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@...labora.com>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@...k-chips.com>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 3/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:47:23PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Am Montag, 9. Januar 2023, 16:57:57 CET schrieb Sebastian Reichel:
> > From: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> >
> > This initial version supports CPU, dma, interrupts, timers, UART and
> > SDHCI (everything necessary to boot Linux on this system on chip) as
> > well as Ethernet, I2C, PWM and SPI.
> >
> > The DT is split into rk3588 and rk3588s, which is a reduced version
> > (i.e. with less peripherals) of the former.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@...k-chips.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> > [rebase, squash and reword commit message]
>
> I guess that means the list of Rockchip Signed-off-by lines above come
> from the squashed patches?
>
> If so, I guess I should add Co-Developed-by lines for them, as right now
> the list is incorrect (author should be first, then everyone through
> whose hands a patch went)
>
> Meaning I can add those Co-Developed-by lines, so no need to resend,
> I'm just verifying what I assume about the lines :-)
Yes, those are SoB lines from squashed downstream commits.
Thanks,
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists