[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <167335357249.4906.12734987935688647985.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 12:26:12 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/boot: Avoid using Intel mnemonics in AT&T syntax asm
The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 7c6dd961d0c8e7e8f9fdc65071fb09ece702e18d
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/7c6dd961d0c8e7e8f9fdc65071fb09ece702e18d
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 12:15:40 +01:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 13:03:23 +01:00
x86/boot: Avoid using Intel mnemonics in AT&T syntax asm
With 'GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.39.90.20221231' the
build now reports:
arch/x86/realmode/rm/../../boot/bioscall.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/realmode/rm/../../boot/bioscall.S:35: Warning: found `movsd'; assuming `movsl' was meant
arch/x86/realmode/rm/../../boot/bioscall.S:70: Warning: found `movsd'; assuming `movsl' was meant
arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S: Assembler messages:
arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S:35: Warning: found `movsd'; assuming `movsl' was meant
arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S:70: Warning: found `movsd'; assuming `movsl' was meant
Which is due to:
PR gas/29525
Note that with the dropped CMPSD and MOVSD Intel Syntax string insn
templates taking operands, mixed IsString/non-IsString template groups
(with memory operands) cannot occur anymore. With that
maybe_adjust_templates() becomes unnecessary (and is hence being
removed).
More details: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29525
Borislav Petkov further explains:
" the particular problem here is is that the 'd' suffix is
"conflicting" in the sense that you can have SSE mnemonics like movsD %xmm...
and the same thing also for string ops (which is the case here) so apparently
the agreement in binutils land is to use the always accepted suffixes 'l' or 'q'
and phase out 'd' slowly... "
Fixes: 7a734e7dd93b ("x86, setup: "glove box" BIOS calls -- infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@...en8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Y71I3Ex2pvIxMpsP@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
---
arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S b/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
index 5521ea1..aa9b964 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ intcall:
movw %dx, %si
movw %sp, %di
movw $11, %cx
- rep; movsd
+ rep; movsl
/* Pop full state from the stack */
popal
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ intcall:
jz 4f
movw %sp, %si
movw $11, %cx
- rep; movsd
+ rep; movsl
4: addw $44, %sp
/* Restore state and return */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists