lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXFtmK0jOt1Boeb6t=DoyVg6xWgCMVEB59jCm8zz7XcNAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:30:27 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...tonmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add generic framebuffer support to EFI earlycon driver

On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 15:04, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 03:42:33PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > (cc Andy)
>
> I believe there are two reasons I'm Cc'ed now:
> - the Cc was forgotten. because I remember reviewing some parts
>   of this contribution
> - this conflicts (to some extent) with my patch that speeds up
>   the scrolling
>
> For the first it's obvious what to do, I think Markuss can include me
> in his v4.
>
> For the second I don't see the functional clash. The scrolling in this
> series is not anyhow optimized. I think my patch should go first as
> - it is less intrusive
> - it has been tested, or can be tested easily
>
> Tell me if I'm missing something here.
>

Thanks for your input.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ