linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add generic framebuffer support to EFI earlycon driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 10 Jan 2023 15:30:27 +0100
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...tonmail.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>,
        Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add generic framebuffer support to EFI earlycon driver

On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 15:04, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 03:42:33PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > (cc Andy)
>
> I believe there are two reasons I'm Cc'ed now:
> - the Cc was forgotten. because I remember reviewing some parts
>   of this contribution
> - this conflicts (to some extent) with my patch that speeds up
>   the scrolling
>
> For the first it's obvious what to do, I think Markuss can include me
> in his v4.
>
> For the second I don't see the functional clash. The scrolling in this
> series is not anyhow optimized. I think my patch should go first as
> - it is less intrusive
> - it has been tested, or can be tested easily
>
> Tell me if I'm missing something here.
>

Thanks for your input.