[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2430913.1673452085@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:48:05 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, "mauro carvalho chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"randy dunlap" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"jonathan corbet" <corbet@....net>,
"fabio m. de francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>,
"eric dumazet" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"christophe jaillet" <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
"eric biggers" <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
"keyrings" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] include/linux/watch_queue: Improve documentation
Siddh Raman Pant <code@...dh.me> wrote:
> But what about the second patch? Should I send that without these doc
> changes?
Can you repost it without the first patch being present?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists