[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87358ggayt.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 19:52:42 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>, Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] genirq/irqdomain/msi: Add
irq_domain_alloc_irqs_affinity() wrapper
On Tue, Dec 13 2022 at 15:08, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The full __irq_domain_alloc_irqs() interface was initially only intended
> for some legacy (x86) use cases while most callers should use the
> irq_domain_alloc_irqs() wrapper.
>
> Add a matching irq_domain_alloc_irqs_affinity() wrapper that can be used
> when an affinity hint needs to be provided and use it for MSI
> allocations.
I definitely like the irqchip cleanup, but this one is core code and
having the extra wrapper is not really buying us much.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists