[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7b4942dcb62056703eff0e07e23acbd152a10f6.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:57:22 +1100
From: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, gcwilson@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nayna@...ux.ibm.com,
zohar@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] powerpc/pseries: Implement secvars for dynamic
secure boot
On Fri, 2023-01-06 at 21:49 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> > index a3b4d99567cb..94e08c405d50 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
> > @@ -162,6 +162,19 @@ config PSERIES_PLPKS
> >
> > If unsure, select N.
> >
> > +config PSERIES_PLPKS_SECVAR
> > + depends on PSERIES_PLPKS
> > + depends on PPC_SECURE_BOOT
> > + bool "Support for the PLPKS secvar interface"
> > + help
> > + PowerVM can support dynamic secure boot with user-defined
> > keys
> > + through the PLPKS. Keystore objects used in dynamic
> > secure boot
> > + can be exposed to the kernel and userspace through the
> > powerpc
> > + secvar infrastructure. Select this to enable the PLPKS
> > backend
> > + for secvars for use in pseries dynamic secure boot.
> > +
> > + If unsure, select N.
>
> I don't think we need that config option at all, or if we do it
> should
> not be user selectable and just enabled automatically by
> PSERIES_PLPKS.
I actually think we should get rid of both PSERIES_PLPKS_SECVAR and
PSERIES_PLPKS, and just use PPC_SECURE_BOOT / PPC_SECVAR_SYSFS.
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
ajd@...ux.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
Powered by blists - more mailing lists