[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230111054520.GA17158@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 06:45:20 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
Cc: hch@....de, axboe@...nel.dk, dwagner@...e.de, hare@...e.de,
ming.lei@...hat.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.garry@...wei.com, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/14] blk-mq: make blk_mq_commit_rqs a general
function for all commits
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 09:01:52PM +0800, Kemeng Shi wrote:
> 1. rename orignal blk_mq_commit_rqs to blk_mq_plug_commit_rqs as
> trace_block_unplug is only needed when we dispatch request from plug list.
Why? I think always having the trace even for the commit case seems
very useful for making the traces useful.
> +/* blk_mq_commit_rqs and blk_mq_plug_commit_rqs notify driver using
> + * bd->last that there is no more requests. (See comment in struct
This is not the normal kernel comment style.
> +static void blk_mq_commit_rqs(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int queued)
> +{
> + if (hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs && queued) {
> + hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
> + }
No need for the braces.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists