[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230111001331.cxdeh52vvta6ok2p@offworld>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 16:13:31 -0800
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, michel@...pinasse.org,
jglisse@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
hannes@...xchg.org, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, peterz@...radead.org,
ldufour@...ux.ibm.com, laurent.dufour@...ibm.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org, songliubraving@...com,
peterx@...hat.com, david@...hat.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
hughd@...gle.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
punit.agrawal@...edance.com, lstoakes@...il.com,
peterjung1337@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, joelaf@...gle.com, minchan@...gle.com,
jannh@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com, tatashin@...gle.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, gthelen@...gle.com, gurua@...gle.com,
arjunroy@...gle.com, soheil@...gle.com, hughlynch@...gle.com,
leewalsh@...gle.com, posk@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/41] mm: introduce CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
On Mon, 09 Jan 2023, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>This configuration variable will be used to build the support for VMA
>locking during page fault handling.
>
>This is enabled by default on supported architectures with SMP and MMU
>set.
>
>The architecture support is needed since the page fault handler is called
>from the architecture's page faulting code which needs modifications to
>handle faults under VMA lock.
I don't think that per-vma locking should be something that is user-configurable.
It should just be depdendant on the arch. So maybe just remove CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK?
Thanks,
Davidlohr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists