[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y75gXmBZXQueCuvO@leoy-yangtze.lan>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:09:24 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, tanmay@...vell.com,
mike.leach@...aro.org, sgoutham@...vell.com, gcherian@...vell.com,
lcherian@...vell.com, bbhushan2@...vell.com,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] perf: Use perf_pmu__open_file() and
perf_pmu__scan_file()
On Tue, Jan 03, 2023 at 04:20:36PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> Remove some code that duplicates existing methods. This requires that
> some consts are removed because one of the existing helper methods takes
> a struct perf_pmu instead of a name which has a non const name field.
> But except for the tests, the strings were already non const.
>
> No functional changes.
[...]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pmu.h b/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
> index 2f2bb0286e2a..8f39e2d17fb1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.h
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #ifndef __PMU_H
> #define __PMU_H
>
> +#include <bits/types/FILE.h>
Nitpick: it's good to use <stdio.h> to replace <bits/types/FILE.h>.
Either way, this patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists