[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <bd62bccb-6970-4cdb-ae23-792b5867705d@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:18:01 +0100
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Naresh Kamboju" <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@...ck-us.net>, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@...x.de>,
"Jon Hunter" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"Sudip Mukherjee" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.0 000/148] 6.0.19-rc1 review
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023, at 07:16, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 23:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions on arm64 Raspberry Pi 4 Model B.
>
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>
> While running LTP controllers cgroup_fj_stress_blkio test cases
> the Insufficient stack space to handle exception! occurred and
> followed by kernel panic on arm64 Raspberry Pi 4 Model B with
> clang-15 built kernel Image.
>
> The full boot and test log attached to this email and build and
> Kconfig links provided in the bottom of this email.
>
> I will try to reproduce this reported issue and get back to you.
I looked at the log between 6.0.18 and 6.0.19-rc1, but don't see
any arm64 or memory management patches that could result in this.
Do you know if 6.0.18 ran successfull
> [ 2893.044339] Insufficient stack space to handle exception!
> [ 2893.044351] ESR: 0x0000000096000047 -- DABT (current EL)
> [ 2893.044360] FAR: 0xffff8000128180d0
> [ 2893.044364] Task stack: [0xffff800012a18000..0xffff800012a1c000]
> [ 2893.044370] IRQ stack: [0xffff80000a798000..0xffff80000a79c000]
> [ 2893.044375] Overflow stack: [0xffff0000f77c4310..0xffff0000f77c5310]
...
> [ 2893.044413] pc : el1h_64_sync+0x0/0x68
> [ 2893.044430] lr : wp_page_copy+0xf8/0x90c
> [ 2893.044445] sp : ffff8000128180d0
...
> [ 2893.044692] el1h_64_sync+0x0/0x68
> [ 2893.044700] do_wp_page+0x4a0/0x5c8
> [ 2893.044708] handle_mm_fault+0x7fc/0x14dc
> [ 2893.044718] do_page_fault+0x29c/0x450
> [ 2893.044727] do_mem_abort+0x4c/0xf8
> [ 2893.044741] el0_da+0x48/0xa8
> [ 2893.044750] el0t_64_sync_handler+0xcc/0xf0
> [ 2893.044759] el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
It claims that the stack overflow happened in do_wp_page(),
but that has a really short call chain. It would be good
to have the source line for do_wp_page+0x4a0/0x5c8 and
wp_page_copy+0xf8/0x90c to see where exactly it was.
> [ 2893.285975] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 315758 at kernel/sched/core.c:3119
> set_task_cpu+0x14c/0x208
....
> [ 2893.286117] CPU: 2 PID: 315758 Comm: cgroup_fj_stres Not tainted
> [ 2893.286416] arch_timer_handler_phys+0x44/0x54
> [ 2893.286427] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x220
> [ 2893.286439] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x38/0x50
> [ 2893.286447] gic_handle_irq+0x68/0xe8
> [ 2893.286455] el1_interrupt+0x88/0xc8
> [ 2893.286464] el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24
> [ 2893.286474] el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68
> [ 2893.286482] panic+0x2d8/0x374
This is apparently a second unrelated bug -- it still processes timer
interrupts after calling panic() and this apparently fails because
the system is already unusable.
> artifact-location:
> https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2K9JDtix2mHMoYRjNkBef3oR5JT
file not found. I tried to get the vmlinux file to look at the disassembly
but the artifacts appear to be gone already.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists