[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r0w1ia65.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 12:26:58 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
sboyd@...nel.org, corbet@....net, Mark.Rutland@....com,
maz@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com, neeraju@...eaurora.org,
ak@...ux.intel.com, feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH clocksource 5/6] clocksource: Suspend the watchdog
temporarily when high read latency detected
On Wed, Jan 04 2023 at 17:07, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> This can be reproduced by running memory intensive 'stream' tests,
> or some of the stress-ng subcases such as 'ioport'.
>
> The reason for these issues is the when system is under heavy load, the
> read latency of the clocksources can be very high. Even lightweight TSC
> reads can show high latencies, and latencies are much worse for external
> clocksources such as HPET or the APIC PM timer. These latencies can
> result in false-positive clocksource-unstable determinations.
>
> Given that the clocksource watchdog is a continual diagnostic check with
> frequency of twice a second, there is no need to rush it when the system
> is under heavy load. Therefore, when high clocksource read latencies
> are detected, suspend the watchdog timer for 5 minutes.
We should have enough heuristics in place by now to qualify the output of
the clocksource watchdog as a random number generator, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists