[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230111114059.6553-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 17:10:55 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
To: kishon@...nel.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org, vidyas@...dia.com, vigneshr@...com,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Subject: [RESEND v4 1/5] PCI: dra7xx: Use threaded IRQ handler for "dra7xx-pcie-main" IRQ
The "dra7xx-pcie-main" hard IRQ handler is just printing the IRQ status
and calling the dw_pcie_ep_linkup() API if LINK_UP status is set. But the
execution of dw_pcie_ep_linkup() depends on the EPF driver and may take
more time depending on the EPF implementation.
In general, hard IRQ handlers are supposed to return quickly and not block
for so long. Moreover, there is no real need of the current IRQ handler to
be a hard IRQ handler. So switch to the threaded IRQ handler for the
"dra7xx-pcie-main" IRQ.
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
---
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
index 38462ed11d07..4ae807e7cf79 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-dra7xx.c
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ static int dra7xx_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
dra7xx->mode = mode;
- ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, dra7xx_pcie_irq_handler,
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, dra7xx_pcie_irq_handler,
IRQF_SHARED, "dra7xx-pcie-main", dra7xx);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to request irq\n");
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists