[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230111123532.GB3673@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:35:32 +0100
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: hanjinke <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, josef@...icpanda.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yinxin.x@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3] blk-throtl: Introduce sync and async
queues for blk-throtl
Hello.
Thanks all for sharing ideas and more details (in time-previous messages).
On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 02:07:38AM +0800, hanjinke <hanjinke.666@...edance.com> wrote:
> But for some specific scenarios with old kernel versions, blk-throtl
> is alose needed. The scenario described in my email is in the early stage of
> research and extensive testing for it. During this period,some priority
> inversion issues amoug cgroups or within one cgroup have been observed. So I
> send this patch to try to fix or mitigate some of these issues.
Jinke, do you combine blk-throtl with memory limits? (As that could in theory
indirectly reduce async requests as dirtier would be slowed down.)
Thanks,
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists