[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTRzS0hBdqBUNbijvKKx3Kf_mY55XSkUyPJsfOK8p15_Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 21:22:09 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: anup@...infault.org, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, heiko@...ech.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mhiramat@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com, bp@...e.de,
jpoimboe@...nel.org, suagrfillet@...il.com, andy.chiu@...ive.com,
e.shatokhin@...ro.com, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next V6 1/7] riscv: ftrace: Fixup panic by disabling preemption
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:20 AM Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2023 at 08:35:43AM -0500, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> > From: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@...ive.com>
> >
> > In RISCV, we must use an AUIPC + JALR pair to encode an immediate,
> > forming a jump that jumps to an address over 4K. This may cause errors
> > if we want to enable kernel preemption and remove dependency from
> > patching code with stop_machine(). For example, if a task was switched
> > out on auipc. And, if we changed the ftrace function before it was
> > switched back, then it would jump to an address that has updated 11:0
> > bits mixing with previous XLEN:12 part.
> >
> > p: patched area performed by dynamic ftrace
> > ftrace_prologue:
> > p| REG_S ra, -SZREG(sp)
> > p| auipc ra, 0x? ------------> preempted
> > ...
> > change ftrace function
> > ...
> > p| jalr -?(ra) <------------- switched back
> > p| REG_L ra, -SZREG(sp)
> > func:
> > xxx
> > ret
>
> What happens on SMP but not !PREEMPTION; can't a CPU be in the middle of this
> while you're patching the sequence?
Yes, when PREEMPTION, a timer interrupt between auipc & jalr may cause
context_switch. And riscv uses stop_machine for patch_text. Then, we
may modify auipc part, but only execute the jalr part when return.
>
> Do you have any guarantee as to the atomicity and ordering of instruction
> fetches?
Not yet. If the region is short, we could use nop + jalr pair instead.
Only one jalr instruction makes the entry atomicity.
There are already several proposed solutions:
1. Make stop_machine guarantee all CPU out of preemption point.
2. Expand -fpatchable-function-entry from 4 to 24, and make detour
codes atomicity.
3. We want to propose a solution to make auipc by hardware mask_irq.
For more details, see:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JkkkXuEvCw
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>
> >
> > Fixes: afc76b8b8011 ("riscv: Using PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY instead of MCOUNT")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@...ive.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index e2b656043abf..ee0d39b26794 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ config RISCV
> > select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS if HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> > select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD if !XIP_KERNEL
> > select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> > - select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER if !XIP_KERNEL
> > + select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER if !XIP_KERNEL && !PREEMPTION
> >
> > config ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS_MIN
> > default 18 if 64BIT
> > --
> > 2.36.1
> >
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
Powered by blists - more mailing lists