[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <614os9n2-2sq1-2qnr-56q6-1qq628271175@vanv.qr>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:32:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: Dhrystone -- userland version
On Monday 2023-01-09 01:45, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 07:47:07PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>> > However, as this is not Linux-specific, how hard can it be to convince
>> > your distro to include https://github.com/qris/dhrystone-deb.git?
>> > Usually, when I have a full userspace available, I just clone the above,
>> > and debuild it myself.
>>
>> Dunno. I'd not solve it if package was in Debian, but it is not.
>
>I would suspect the better long-term solution would be to get the
>package into Debian, since that will be easier for people to use. I
>suspect the reason why most distros don't include it is because it
>really is a **terrible** benchmark for most use cases.
(All of) you could install boinc-client and just exercise
--run_cpu_benchmarks without (I think) attaching to any particular
computing project. The package should be in distros and you get
both Dhrystone and Whetstone.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists